Social Networky

2037-Jan-18, Sunday 00:00
thorfinn: <user name="seedy_girl"> and <user name="thorfinn"> (Default)
Here is where I exist on various social networks:

  • ([personal profile] thorfinn) is where I put more useful things like actual recipes, discussions of more substance, and similar actual blog-like things; If you're coming from LJ over to Dreamwidth, log in after reading DW OpenID Help to you can comment. If you're on DW and I've subscribed to you, I've most likely given you access too. Please don't feel obligated to give me access back unless you want to. I use tighter filters for any seriously sensitive content, so my access list is just for "I don't want this content permanently cached anywhere else".

  • ([ profile] thorfi) is where I put random micro thoughts, general chatter and some types of linkspam;

  • is where I handle social events, gossip, more link spam, some photos and suchlike;

  • Apple Game Center Nickname: thorfi
  • ([ profile] thorfinn) is where I originally kept all of the stuff that is now on Dreamwidth, but I have migrated all content to DW and will be posting on DW and crossposting to LJ. I still read LJ. (My old post Migrating from LJ to DW has some mumbling about why.)

I do not auto gateway any stuff between the various social networky places, since I am using them for quite different purposes.

thorfinn: <user name="seedy_girl"> and <user name="thorfinn"> (Default)
Hi. I keep seeing a lot of "Apple are stupid" comments going around the place.

Don't get me wrong - there are certainly a lot of rabid and stupid Apple fans out there. But there are a lot of rabid stupid Google fans, or Microsoft fans, or Linux fans out there too. There's plenty of stupid to go around for everyone, and it's not magically unique to Apple.

This "Apple is stupid" meme seems to primarily be based around the idea that Apple's latest product release doesn't have some common feature that "everyone else has", and therefore they must be stupid.

The lack of certain common features in a variety of their products is not stupid on Apple's part. It's an absolutely crystal clear, conscious, heavily researched, deliberate, end user tried and tested decision to keep the feature set and number of options down to a useful minimum.

The simple reason for that is that they do not wish to present the average consumer and user with choice paralysis. Most normal people open up a common application or system options dialog box and go, "argh, what the hell do I have to tweak, I see six million options none of which are what I care about?"

That's what Apple are avoiding. If you open up an Apple product, the odds are you'll be able to figure out how to use its basic functions without needing to read a manual or search for instructions. Contrast that with my latest recently work acquired Nokia phone, where I, a hardcore geek who has owned several Nokia phones, had to open the manual to figure out where the power button was.

This difference is precisely because they're willing to cut features that "everyone else has" when they are reasonably certain those features are not actually a common use case, and particularly so when there is some alternative method to get to that use case that isn't too bad.

Yes, that means that you (and me, and everyone) probably have some pet desired feature or features that don't exist in Apple Product Du Jour.

You know what? That's fine with me. And if you don't like the featureset offered by a particular product, nobody is making you buy it. There are plenty of options elsewhere.

That kind of gap is also what the third party software market exists to fill - whether it's the hundreds of thousands of apps on the iOS app store, or a similar volume of mac freeware and shareware apps, or the vast volumes of Windows and Linux applications out there, etc.

I don't know any geeks using any operating system who don't immediately go and install a bunch of third party stuff to make things go the way they want to. And the set of stuff they install? All different for each of them. Doesn't matter what OS you're using, everybody does that.

Essentially, the fact that some product doesn't have some features you desire doesn't make it stupid. If you need those features, then just get them elsewhere, don't complain that product is stupid, when those features are available from somewhere else.

So can we stop calling Apple (and anyone that happens to use their stuff) stupid now?


ETA: I totally don't mind if you call Apple annoying for what they're doing. That might even be true. Stupid is just not factual.
thorfinn: <user name="seedy_girl"> and <user name="thorfinn"> (Default)
Oh hi. I forgot to mention. Macs are awesome. Your next computer should be a Mac, assuming you just want a computer where you can do general average day to day stuff and Get Things Done.

If you want to do a specific weird thing (yes, hardcore computer game nerds, that mostly does mean you), then alright, you have special needs, and probably need more thought than just buying a Mac will necessarily get you. You already have the mad skillz needed to go do that. This message isn't for you.

However, for everyone else, if you just want to get connected to the internet, do email, browse the web, maybe do some word processing, download pictures off your digital camera, maybe upload some pictures to the interweb, even have automated hourly backups done for you... then absolutely just get a Mac already.

Oh, and if you're a unix tech-head, you really want a Mac too. Just think, a real Unix OS with a consumer grade UI on top.


He says it better than I do.

April 2015

12131415 161718


RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags